Elton upon nude girls

Added: Junior Bartlow - Date: 30.12.2021 23:58 - Views: 37441 - Clicks: 2763

Its the same as people hurting other people after they have watched a violent movie or played a violent video game. Or rapists watching porn then praying on young women afterwards. Quite so. Last night we attended a marvellous performance of King Learand on the way home, I naturally had to stop to gouge out a few eyes. Well, no, I didn't, but someone might, so we'd better do something about it. Some purists may quibble, but surely the show can go on with a nice group conflict resolution session in place of that nastiness.

I've now seen a slightly edited copy of the photo.

animales dating

It's just a pair of children playing. It looks natural, not staged or posed; children that age often don't care whether they're dressed. Is it art? Well, I probably wouldn't hang it on my wall, unless the only other option were a black velvet Elvis, but evidently people who are interested in contemporary art consider it so.

extreme dating   online

I suppose Keats' criteria applies as much to this, as much as to the photo of someone's breakfast in the 'Museum' thread. The children arent being sexual in their own eyes, or ther photographers, but i guarentee that to a paedo they will be. Opinions differ I don't like paying a tax on the DVDs I use to store my photos just because some people use them to copy movies. I don't like filling out forms and paying a tax to keep my WWI rifle just because some criminals carry guns. I don't like driving four miles across town for a bottle of wine and, surprise, paying an extra tax just because some people are alcoholics.

I could go on It's a shame that this thread has turned into an amateur psychology rant rather than discussing the issues at stake. All those Taliban here have it wrong. The reason why police do and should prosecute child pornography is to protect the children posing in the photos from exploitation. They shouldn't care less if, when, and where some pedophile gets excited. The only way to prevent that would be to lock them up for life or castrate them.

See, according to the CNN report, the police took the picture "to assess whether or not an offense had been committed". I doubt that they are going to parade the photo in front of a focus group of pedophiles and measure their heart rate or something else. However, they may want to find out the circumstances under which the photo was taken. Just wondering if anyone saw this article. I have not seen a copy of the picture but it is interesting since the Elton upon nude girls picture has been displayed so many times and sold several times an major Auction houses. This article puts the whole event into perspective without even mentioning the word pedophile funnily enough.

It tells how there is a wiff of deja vu about all of this storm in a teacup and how the picture was exhibited at the well resopected Saatchi Galery at their "I am a Camera" exhibition six years ago and removed by the police then. The crown prosecution found, to the police' annoyance that there wasn't enough evidence to go to court over it.

The picture is one of pictures in an installation of pictures called Thanksgiving. Elton John has one of the largest private collections of photographs in the world. Shall we stick to the facts and make our own minds up, or listen to idle chatter and unfounded insinuations? You don't have to go to the exhibition if you don't want to. Chato wrote: There are a great of zoophilists out there, most of them pretty harmless.

Yes, sad to say, but most of Elton upon nude girls recongnise the absurdity of their condition and never act on it. I ask, How can we catch these criminals if they never act out? Easy enough folks, because there are probably a great of mentally ill people whom we can CONVINCE are missing out on an important part of the sexual experience.

So here's Chato's handy dandy guide to appeal to the mental cases, focus them on the physical attaction of some "Hot Babe Pooch," and get them out of the closet where we can punish them! Run news stories on the sexual attraction that Flossy the French Poodle holds for some people.

dating cancer man

Reemind the public, that the "inncocent" man who coo's and pets your dog, might not be that innocent after all. Start watching photographers carefully. Do they specifically focus on Your dog? Why your little Flossy? Point out the huge of beastiality sites on the internet. Post examples of dogs that have been abused.

momo dating site

Let people know that being sexually aroused by Dogs, is a legitimate lust, although of course also abuse. Take a good look at that dog walker that seems, well, a wee bit to familiar with your dog! Crackdown on Gallery images and museum images that expose the various sexual organs of dogs. Yes, in summary, being aroused by pets is a disgusting but legtimate lust. We mature people would never let ourselves use our pets as sex objects, but others DO. Perhaps it's wise to simply keep Flossy at home?

Probably, best thing! I dont see how this is a police issue. The info I have is that the painting in question is in good taste. I can only go on that. You, and i, and most people of this site may see an everyday act of 2 children enjoying childhood and having fun. Where a paedo will most certainly look at it differently. I can also see how this may offend.

miss minnie dating

You got that right Matt, far too many people are not aware that these are just two little kids playing around. It's time to convince society that this is NOT normal behavior. It's time to alert all those with mental problems that they were right all along - This is NOT play, it's sex, a sex act in progress, right before our eyes. Too many are unaware of this, let's change their minds!

can you hook up a combo amp to a cabinet

Dinna Touch! If the rest of her photos are of the same high quality, I won't be visiting the exhibition, my five year old daughter takes better pictures. I haven't seen the pic, but the description with a young girl naked, legs spread - sorry, I think that is unnecessary to photograph or print.

I don't say put people who do such things without dirty thought into jail, or call the pedophiles. Sure not. Keep the balance, be reasonable. The girl is young - don't know yet what she is doing - she might be more than just embarrassed about it a couple of years later, to be hung up on walls like this. I haven't read all the posts here but I was under the impression from the reports that the police seized a book of photos which contained that image, not the Elton John owned original print. As for the long-term artistic merit of the artist's images I am not really qualified to judge but in my personal opinion I have seen better by other, lesser known photographers.

single american dating site

Yes, me too, when I looked at my fathers old 8mm shots of me as a four year old. Hardly expressive enough. And I'm on my way, first to ancient Greece and then Rome to smash all the porno that's been kept around for so many centuries Nothing as disgusting as a naked NUDE four year old, revealing those parts of her anatomy that are just sooooooooo sexually arousing.

BTW, I'm going to petition the UN to invade all those countries where the kids play naked in the street. Does anyone have an idea of how much damage these kids will face in later life? Finally, do you have ANY idea of how many Zoophilists there are out there?

Masturbating over all the shots they take at my neighborhood dog run? You have no appreciation of the menace of Zoophilists. And here I was kind enough to provide you with a link. You think I made this up? Naked children playing with their bodily parts exposed have been considered ART for as long as we've been making art. If someone see's something pornographic, why are we encourageing them to belive that is true? We are not saying that is is pronographic as such, we are saying that is it correct to have photos of naked children on display for people Elton upon nude girls see, including possible paedophiles.

There is a fine line between art and pornography i believe. In your eyes it may be art, and in someone elses may be porn. Take the same picture, and replace the children with adult females, would this then be art or porn. Who knows? Are you suggesting that all those countries in the world where children run naked in the streets are an open invitation to pedophillia?

My God, sit back, stop and think this through. There have always been pedophiles. Now your telling all of us to take it seriously? That it's legitimate? That we should reverse our appreciation of children because their there?

Elton upon nude girls

email: [email protected] - phone:(394) 932-9220 x 3295

Sir Elton John owns photo seized from exhibition by child porn police